AI-assisted drafting

Draft from confirmed project information, with the gaps left visible

AI can help organise supplied information and prepare a working draft. It cannot inspect the site, establish an unknown fact or replace competent judgement.

Human reviewer checking an assisted construction document draft.Controlled pilot scope

What the workflow is intended to deliver

01

Reusable project facts

02

Provenance beside facts

03

Targeted review questions

04

Explicit AI limitations

The working sequence

A bounded, reviewable journey

Each stage leaves a record that can be checked. Where the information is unknown or a competent assessment is required, the workflow should say so.

01

Source

Use the canonical project record, not an isolated prompt.

02

Classify

Keep evidenced, confirmed, observed, suggested and unknown information distinct.

03

Draft

Prepare a substantive working document from confirmed information.

04

Review

A competent person amends and decides whether the exact version may be issued.

Evidence carried forward

What should remain traceable

The record is useful only when the source, version and human decision remain connected.

  • Source document reference
  • Fact status
  • Confidence and location
  • Human amendments and decision

Important boundaries

Assistance without false assurance

  • SiteHQ supports a controlled process; it does not approve or certify construction safety.
  • The customer remains responsible for project facts, suitability, competent-person review and approval before use.
  • AI-assisted drafts may be incomplete or wrong and must not be treated as physical site observations.

One controlled founding pilot

One contractor. One active project. A supervised first journey.

£195 + VAT per month · two-month minimum · manual invoice · no automatic renewal.

Discuss fit with SiteHQ