Methodology
Evidence status is part of the record—not hidden in the prose
This method is intended to reduce false certainty. A source saying that something exists is not the same as a competent person seeing and assessing it on site.
Controlled pilot scopeWhat the workflow is intended to deliver
Conflict and gap detection
Targeted verification
Controlled human decision
The working sequence
A bounded, reviewable journey
Each stage leaves a record that can be checked. Where the information is unknown or a competent assessment is required, the workflow should say so.
Document-evidenced
A supplied source supports the fact at a recorded location.
User-confirmed
An identified person explicitly confirms the fact.
Site observation
A person records what they observed; AI never fabricates this status.
AI suggestion
A proposed interpretation or control awaits human confirmation.
Unknown
The fact remains open and requires assessment.
Evidence carried forward
What should remain traceable
The record is useful only when the source, version and human decision remain connected.
- Source identifier
- Location or page
- Capture method
- Fact status
- Reviewer decision
Important boundaries
Assistance without false assurance
- SiteHQ supports a controlled process; it does not approve or certify construction safety.
- The customer remains responsible for project facts, suitability, competent-person review and approval before use.
- AI-assisted drafts may be incomplete or wrong and must not be treated as physical site observations.
One controlled founding pilot
One contractor. One active project. A supervised first journey.
£195 + VAT per month · two-month minimum · manual invoice · no automatic renewal.
Discuss fit with SiteHQ