SiteHQ
Sign inDiscuss a pilot

For H&S reviewers

Review the facts, the draft and the exact version proposed for issue

The reviewer sees what came from documentation, what a user confirmed, what was observed, what AI suggested and what remains unknown.

Discuss a controlled pilotRead the boundaries
Health and safety reviewer assessing controlled project documentation.Controlled pilot scope

What the workflow is intended to deliver

01

Fact-level provenance

02

Visible unknowns

03

Amendment record

04

Hash-bound decision

The working sequence

A bounded, reviewable journey

Each stage leaves a record that can be checked. Where the information is unknown or a competent assessment is required, the workflow should say so.

01

Inspect facts

Review each material fact and its source.

02

Assess drafts

Check the CPP and RAMS against the specific works and project.

03

Amend

Record revisions or conditions without overwriting the baseline.

04

Decide

Approve, condition, revise or reject the exact hashed version.

Evidence carried forward

What should remain traceable

The record is useful only when the source, version and human decision remain connected.

  • Fact provenance
  • Reviewer amendments
  • Decision wording
  • Version hash and date

Important boundaries

Assistance without false assurance

  • SiteHQ supports a controlled process; it does not approve or certify construction safety.
  • The customer remains responsible for project facts, suitability, competent-person review and approval before use.
  • AI-assisted drafts may be incomplete or wrong and must not be treated as physical site observations.

One controlled founding pilot

One contractor. One active project. A supervised first journey.

£195 + VAT per month · two-month minimum · manual invoice · no automatic renewal.

Discuss fit with SiteHQ