Evidence and limitations
What the controlled pilot establishes—and what it does not
The synthetic acceptance evidence shows that the bounded workflow can preserve exact versions, acknowledgements and attendance. It is not evidence that any real project document is suitable.
Controlled pilot scopeWhat the workflow is intended to deliver
Synthetic controlled documents
Defined access boundary
Immutable version history
The working sequence
A bounded, reviewable journey
Each stage leaves a record that can be checked. Where the information is unknown or a competent assessment is required, the workflow should say so.
Established
The accepted pilot build completed its defined technical and synthetic acceptance.
Not established
No real customer, construction project or live H&S document has been approved.
Required next
Every real project needs accurate customer data and separate competent review.
Pilot boundary
Unreviewed modules remain outside the offer.
Evidence carried forward
What should remain traceable
The record is useful only when the source, version and human decision remain connected.
- Exact pilot commit and deployment
- Controlled synthetic CPP/RAMS hashes
- Journey acceptance
- Recorded rollback
Important boundaries
Assistance without false assurance
- SiteHQ supports a controlled process; it does not approve or certify construction safety.
- The customer remains responsible for project facts, suitability, competent-person review and approval before use.
- AI-assisted drafts may be incomplete or wrong and must not be treated as physical site observations.
One controlled founding pilot
One contractor. One active project. A supervised first journey.
£195 + VAT per month · two-month minimum · manual invoice · no automatic renewal.
Discuss fit with SiteHQ