Safety and control
Technology assists the record. People remain responsible for the decision.
SiteHQ is designed to make the review boundary explicit. It does not convert an AI-produced draft into an approved safety document and it does not invent a site inspection.
Controlled pilot scopeWhat the workflow is intended to deliver
Draft and issued states are distinct
Historic versions stay available
Material changes trigger review
The working sequence
A bounded, reviewable journey
Each stage leaves a record that can be checked. Where the information is unknown or a competent assessment is required, the workflow should say so.
Evidence first
Record the source and status of each fact used in a draft.
Competent judgement
A qualified person reviews suitability for the specific project.
Controlled issue
Issue only the approved hash and version.
Change control
Supersede through a new revision and fresh acknowledgement.
Evidence carried forward
What should remain traceable
The record is useful only when the source, version and human decision remain connected.
- Review decision
- Reviewer identity and date
- SHA-256 document hash
- Supersession link
Important boundaries
Assistance without false assurance
- SiteHQ supports a controlled process; it does not approve or certify construction safety.
- The customer remains responsible for project facts, suitability, competent-person review and approval before use.
- AI-assisted drafts may be incomplete or wrong and must not be treated as physical site observations.
One controlled founding pilot
One contractor. One active project. A supervised first journey.
£195 + VAT per month · two-month minimum · manual invoice · no automatic renewal.
Discuss fit with SiteHQ